2015 with St. Lucie: 6-0, 8 GS, 51 IP, 1.76 RA/1.76 ERA/2.80 FIP/2.96 xFIP, 37 H, 10 R, 0.18 HR/9, 37 K: 11 BB (18.9 K%: 5.6 B%), 55 ERA-/87 FIP-/92 xFIP-, 82.7 LOB%, 7 2B, 3B, HR, 61 wRC+, 60.4 GB%: 24.3 FB%: 9 LD%: 6.2 PU%, 1.53 GO/AO, 2.9% HR/FB, Runners went 2-6 on stolen base attempts, with 4 pickoffs credited to Gsellman
2015 with Binghamton (including playoffs): 7-7, 17 GS, 96.2
IP, 4.56 RA/3.54 ERA/3.62 FIP/3.86 xFIP, 98 H, 49 R (38 ER), 0.37 HR/9, 54 K:
29 BB (13.1 K%: 7.1 BB%), 96 ERA-/98 FIP-/105 xFIP-, 64.5 LOB%, 12 2B, 3 3B, 4
HR, 87 wRC+, 51.4 GB%: 23.8 FB%: 16 LD%: 8.8 PU%, 1.06 GO/AO, 5.3% HR/FB, 15.3
P/IP, 6.3 SwStr%, 14.3 Whiff/Swing, Runners went 5-9 on stolen base attempts
with 1 pickoff credited to Gsellman
22-year
old Robert Gsellman has been on a steady rise through the minors since the team
drafted him with the 402nd overall pick in the 2011 draft (13th
round), and now finds himself as one of the top pitching prospects within the
system. That’s mostly because Gsellman had a big year in 2015, which saw him
dominate the FSL for the first half and then put up a strong second half with
Binghamton, but also because the Mets trades last July emptied out much of the
SP depth within the system – I ranked
him the #4 starting pitcher prospect left after Matz was promoted last
year, and then the three guys ahead of him were traded. Gsellman’s strikeout
and runs allowed numbers with the B-Mets aren’t good, but he held EL batters to
an 87 wRC+ last year, and his stuff is better than those strikeout numbers
suggest. Gsellman’s most commonly thrown pitch is a low-90’s sinker that has
some great sinking motion, which has allowed Gsellman to post great groundball
rates throughout the minors, but that Gsellman relies on too much. His best
pitch is a beautiful and big curveball that sits in the upper 70’s and generally
ranks as one of the best pitches in the Mets system, although there was a
recent negative report on it. After seeing him multiple times in the FSL, Jeff
Moore of BP wrote
of the curve, “already an above-average major league pitch, has the
potential to be a legitimate plus offering,” but then BA wrote the following in
their 2016 Prospect Guidebook, “A
long arm action prevents Gsellman from repeating his release point, so his
curveball grades as below-average.” That doesn’t jive with what I’ve seen at all,
as Gsellman has shown great control of the curve, and induces a lot of swinging
strikes with the pitch, which is why I think he would benefit from using it
more often. His repertoire is rounded out with a potentially average changeup
that he pounds the bottom of the zone with. Below I take a look at some trends from his 2015 numbers, and
then share links to a bunch of Gsellman GIF’s posted at Astromets Mind the past
two season, as well as some youtube video’s of Gsellman.
Table 1 – Robert Gsellman 2015 Splits by Month
Month
|
TBF
|
H
|
BB%
|
K%
|
ERA-
|
FIP-
|
xFIP-
|
wRC+
|
GB%
|
SS%
|
W/S
|
April
|
89
|
17
|
6.7
|
20.2
|
67
|
85
|
94
|
81
|
68.9
|
-
|
-
|
FSL May
|
107
|
20
|
4.7
|
17.8
|
47
|
88
|
90
|
45
|
54.2
|
-
|
-
|
EL May
|
21
|
8
|
9.5
|
28.6
|
367
|
136
|
89
|
220
|
38.5
|
7.8
|
22.9
|
June
|
129
|
29
|
10.1
|
15.5
|
87
|
99
|
108
|
89
|
47.4
|
6.3
|
14.4
|
July
|
128
|
25
|
4.7
|
8.6
|
53
|
96
|
109
|
48
|
57.4
|
4.4
|
9.7
|
August
|
86
|
17
|
2.3
|
11.6
|
70
|
88
|
89
|
35
|
51.5
|
7.1
|
14.7
|
September
|
47
|
19
|
12.8
|
14.9
|
235
|
112
|
128
|
223
|
48.5
|
9.4
|
22.1
|
SS% = Swinging Strike%, W/S = Whiff/Swing
Table 2 – Robert Gsellman 2015 Platoon Splits
LG
|
Bats
|
TBF
|
Pull%
|
H
|
AB/XBH
|
BB%
|
K%
|
wRC+
|
GB%
|
SS%
|
W/S
|
FSL
|
L
|
72
|
40
|
17
|
34
|
4.2
|
19.4
|
67
|
65.5
|
-
|
-
|
FSL
|
R
|
124
|
37.8
|
20
|
16.1
|
6.5
|
18.5
|
58
|
57.3
|
-
|
-
|
EL
|
L
|
213
|
34.4
|
48
|
23.5
|
8
|
14.6
|
77
|
48.1
|
6.7
|
15.1
|
EL
|
R
|
198
|
48.8
|
50
|
16.7
|
6.1
|
11.6
|
98
|
54.7
|
6
|
13.4
|
There
is a mix of usable and unusable pitch log information available from the FSL,
and I haven’t sorted out the unusable yet, so I’m just omitting all pitch log
info from the FSL for now, which is why I’ve put dashes in a few table cells. Table
1 helps show that Gsellman was actually very good for most of his time in AA,
but happened to have a couple of bad starts, one when he first got there and
then another to finish the season. Gsellman’s game is pitching to contact and
looking to end an AB in as few pitches as possible, preferably by inducing a
groundball, so his teams infield defense is going to be key. The B-Mets middle
infield committed a lot of errors in 2015 – 28 from Gavin Cecchini and 13 from
L.J. Mazzilli in his half a season – and Gsellman was hurt by the errors more
than most B-Mets starters, as you can see by the 9 unearned runs allowed. He
was also significantly better with the bases empty during his time in
Binghamton (.253 wOBA allowed with the bases empty), which probably explains
the lower than average LOB%. Thanks to his approach and big sinker, he hasn’t
shown big platoon splits yet in the minors, and could end up better against
lefties if his changeup keeps developing.
Table 3 – Robert Gsellman 2015 Splits by Batted Ball Type
League
|
Batted Ball Type
|
TBF
|
BABIP
|
LG BABIP
|
wOBA
|
LG wOBA
|
FSL
|
FB
|
35
|
.147
|
.261
|
.224
|
.339
|
FSL
|
GB
|
89
|
.258
|
.243
|
.268
|
.239
|
FSL
|
LD
|
13
|
.615
|
.757
|
.649
|
.805
|
EL
|
FB
|
76
|
.153
|
.264
|
.282
|
.367
|
EL
|
GB
|
173
|
.256
|
.247
|
.241
|
.236
|
EL
|
LD
|
51
|
.765
|
.705
|
.777
|
.750
|
Table 4 – Robert Gsellman 2015 Splits by Times Through the
Order
League
|
Bats
|
TBF
|
H
|
AB/XBH
|
BB%
|
K%
|
wRC+
|
GB%
|
SwStr%
|
Wh/Sw
|
FSL
|
1
|
72
|
15
|
23.3
|
2.8
|
13.9
|
45
|
65.5
|
-
|
-
|
FSL
|
2
|
71
|
7
|
20
|
9.9
|
23.9
|
35
|
70.5
|
-
|
-
|
FSL
|
3
|
50
|
14
|
16
|
4
|
20
|
120
|
41
|
-
|
-
|
EL
|
1
|
155
|
32
|
23.5
|
6.5
|
14.2
|
67
|
64.7
|
7
|
15.2
|
EL
|
2
|
151
|
38
|
19.7
|
7.3
|
13.2
|
92
|
48.7
|
6.5
|
14.7
|
EL
|
3
|
102
|
28
|
15
|
7.8
|
10.8
|
117
|
37.3
|
4.9
|
11.7
|
Gsellman
limited damage on fly balls last year because he allowed pull side fly balls
less than 15% of the time to both lefties and righties, and pull side is
obviously the power side. Given his stuff and penchant for attacking the bottom
of the strike zone, he should be able to maintain his high groundball rate and
continue to limit damage on fly balls, which is at least a 5th
starter in the major league. He could make a bigger impact if he uses his
strikeout stuff more wisely, but it’s not as important that Gsellman puts up
big strikeout numbers as it is important that he can throw strikeout stuff when
the situation calls. With Noah Syndergaard, Steven Matz, and then Seth Lugo, I
noticed a pattern in their minor league pitch usage at AA and AAA that Gsellman
hasn’t shown yet: they rarely threw their curve or change the first time
through the order, and then broke it out with more frequency the rest of their
outing, which kept them effective later in the game. I’ll be tracking his pitch
usage more closely this season, but I expect to see this pattern develop for
Gsellman too.
Overall,
Gsellman isn’t the stud that the recent top Mets pitching prospects were, but
he’s still a promising young arm. I think his most likely outcome is more in
the #4 quality starter range, but I am ready to upgrade that if he starts
attacking with his curve more and/or the change becomes more consistent. He
uses a low effort delivery, so he shouldn’t be a big injury risk, and he
finishes in a good fielding position – I’ve included a few fielding GIF’s below
as well for your viewing pleasure. I expect he’ll start the year back in AA and
end up in AAA around midseason, but he’ll have to earn it, as the Mets handling
of Gabriel Ynoa last year suggests they won’t promote him just because he’s
thrown x number of innings at the level. He was added to the Mets 40-man roster
this past season, so there is some time-related pressure for him to prove
capable against AA and AAA batters, but he’s not exactly going to break through
to the Mets rotation anytime soon. Because of this, while the Mets might not
want to keep trading their SP depth from the minors, Gsellman will be one of
the Mets best trading chips over the next few trading seasons, so he may end up
debuting with another team, and is surely to be the centerpiece of too many fan
trade proposals.
2015 Astromets Mind Coverage
Strikeout #1 came on a 79 MPH Curveball with a 1-2 count
Strikeout #2 came on a 2-2 changeup
Strikeout #3 came on a 1-2 pitch in the dirt
Strikeout #4 came on a high fastball with a 1-2 count
Strikeout #1 came on a 0-2 curveball in the dirt
Strikeout #2 came on a 0-2 curveball (swinging)
Strikeout #3 came on a 1-2 curveball in the dirt
Strikeout #4 came on a 0-2 curveball in the dirt
Strikeout #5 came on a 3-2 fastball (swinging)
Strikeout #1 came on a 0-2 curveball in the dirt
Strikeout #2 came on a 93 MPH fastball down the middle with
a 2-2 count
Strikeout #1 came on a 1-2 fastball at the letters
(swinging)
Strikeout #2 came on a 1-2 curveball at the knees and
outside corner (looking)
Strikeout #3 came on a 93 MPH fastball on the black with a
1-2 count (swinging)
Strikeout #1 came on a 1-2 sinker low and inside (swinging)
Strikeout #2 came on a 2-2 curveball (swinging)
Strikeout #3 came on a 0-2 curveball in the dirt
Strikeout #1 came on a 0-2 curveball (swinging)
Strikeout #1 came on a 0-2 changeup in the dirt
Strikeout #2 came on a 1-2 changeup (swinging)
Strikeout #3 came on a 0-2 changeup down and away (swinging)
Strikeout #4 came on a 0-2 curveball in the dirt
Strikeout #5 came on a 0-2 changeup
Some Other Online Video Coverage of Gsellman
New Dark Matter Theory Weighs Superheavy Particle https://t.co/9A6ghso1bb pic.twitter.com/ufGuuVAESO— Fraser Cain (@fcain) March 18, 2016
Leave your comment
Post a Comment