Lugo broke onto the scene in a big way last year and is looking like another
promising late-bloomer for the Mets
2015 with B-Mets: 19 GS, 109 IP, 4.46 RA/3.80 ERA/3.41 FIP/3.34 xFIP, 466 TBF, 97 SO: 30 BB (20.8 K%: 6.4 BB%), 108 H, 54 R (46 ER), 0.66 HR/9, 103 ERA-/92 FIP-/91 xFIP-, 67.5 LOB%, 22 2B, 7 3B, 8 HR, allowed 4-8 on stolen bases, .310 BABIP, .141 ISO, 99 wRC+, 42.5 GB%: 30 FB%: 19.9 LD%: 7.6 PU%, 8.2% HR/FB, 9.2 SwStr%, 20.1 Whiff/Swing
2015 with Las Vegas 51s: 5 GS, 27 IP, 4.33 RA/4.00 ERA/3.60 FIP/3.23 xFIP, 114 TBF, 30 SO: 5 BB (26.3 K%: 4.4 BB%), 27 H, 13 R (12 ER), 1 HR/9, 92 ERA-/82 FIP-/74 xFIP-, 70.5 LOB%, .324 BABIP, .112 ISO, 74 wRC+, 42.7 GB%: 28 FB%: 21.3 LD%: 8 PU%, 14.3% HR/FB, 9.3 SwStr%, 19.4 Whiff/Swing
The
emergence of Seth Lugo as a legit starting prospect was easily the most
pleasant surprise for me from the Mets system in 2015. When he made the
Binghamton 6-man rotation out of Spring Training, I figured he was just filling
the role until Michael Fulmer came back, but then he made a brilliant
first start, and then he looked just as nasty in his
second start, and I quickly caught on: this guy could pitch. He’s usually
around 90 MPH with his fastball, but he would dial it up as high as 95-96 MPH
at times last year. His best pitch is a nice, big curve that sits in the 76-78
MPH range, and Baseball America scouts love – from their 2016 Prospect Guidebook, “…the best breaking ball on the farm: a
plus, mid-70’s curveball with tight spin and late break.” He also mixes in a
changeup (mid-80’s), although there wasn’t much of a velocity separation from the fastball, and an improving slider. Unless he’s throwing the curveball or
mid-90’s heat, Lugo’s stuff doesn’t scream swing-and-miss, but it all plays up
thanks to his excellent command. I covered 22 of his 24 starts here at
Astromets Mind, and I’ve linked to all of my coverage at the bottom of this
page, where I’ve also included: his final line for each game covered, all of
the Lugo pitch GIF links posted on those pages (60+ in total), and strikeout
details where available when I had no GIF’s. There’s a lot about Seth Lugo’s
2015 down there, because I was fortunate enough to get a lot of good coverage
of him last year, so go nuts. Before I leave you to have fun searching through the GIF’s
and other info at the bottom, let’s review some trends from his 2015 splits.
Table 1 – Seth Lugo 2015 Splits by Month
Month
|
TBF
|
H
|
BB%
|
K%
|
ERA-
|
FIP-
|
xFIP-
|
wRC+
|
GB%
|
SS%
|
W/S
|
April
|
54
|
13
|
3.7
|
24.1
|
38
|
53
|
70
|
84
|
59.5
|
12.2
|
26.3
|
May
|
129
|
28
|
5.4
|
22.5
|
93
|
93
|
82
|
89
|
42.9
|
7
|
15.7
|
June
|
104
|
29
|
6.7
|
12.5
|
192
|
119
|
121
|
143
|
32.5
|
6.9
|
15.4
|
July
|
153
|
30
|
7.2
|
24.2
|
65
|
82
|
82
|
68
|
47.5
|
11.4
|
23.4
|
EL August
|
26
|
8
|
11.6
|
19.2
|
245
|
154
|
137
|
192
|
22.2
|
9.1
|
23.1
|
PCL August
|
95
|
23
|
3.2
|
28.4
|
81
|
54
|
62
|
58
|
45.2
|
9.8
|
19.4
|
September
|
19
|
4
|
10.5
|
15.8
|
155
|
248
|
139
|
156
|
30.8
|
7
|
19.2
|
SS% = Swinging Strike%, W/S = Whiff/Swing
One
trend that stands out breaking things down by month is that Lugo’s ERA success
was dependent on his GB%. After using his curveball in any count during his
first two great starts of the season, it seemed like he was using it less for
awhile, and that might explain his dip in Whiff/Swing rate during May and June.
Those rates were average for the season, but above average in April, July,
August, and September. He had 20 strikeouts over 12 innings in back-to-back
starts with Las Vegas in August, making some good Rangers and Marlins prospects
look awful in the process, and the transition to the PCL look a little too
easy. Overall, Seth Lugo went from afterthought to top of the Mets starting
pitching depth in 2015, and I’m excited to see if he can go out and do it again
in 2016.
Table 2 – Seth Lugo 2015 Platoon Splits
League
|
Bats
|
TBF
|
H
|
AB/XBH
|
BB%
|
K%
|
wRC+
|
GB%
|
SwStr%
|
Wh/Sw
|
EL
|
L
|
208
|
50
|
14.5
|
8.2
|
17.8
|
101
|
42.4
|
8.3
|
18.1
|
EL
|
R
|
258
|
58
|
9.9
|
5
|
23.3
|
97
|
42.6
|
10
|
21.8
|
PCL
|
L
|
54
|
15
|
12.5
|
7.4
|
18.5
|
105
|
47.5
|
7.3
|
15
|
PCL
|
R
|
60
|
12
|
28.5
|
1.7
|
33.3
|
46
|
37.1
|
11.3
|
24
|
Lugo’s
stuff is capable of getting both sides out, but lefties will have an edge
against him until his changeup improves. Unless he starts sitting at 95 MPH
instead of topping out there – in which case, hello Jacob deGrom 2.0 – or he
only throws changeups after his fastest fastballs, Lugo’s changeup is only
about 5 MPH slower than his fastball. Speed differential isn’t everything for a
changeup, and every pitcher’s changeup takes time to personalize (read former Mets
pitcher Brian Bannister’s thoughts on personalizing a changeup here),
but Lugo’s changeup needs work. I hope he’s had a chance to work on his
changeup with some of the guys in camp, because there are some good ones on the
major league squad, but most of all I hope he’s had a chance to work with Big
Sexy Bartolo Colon. Colon makes it working without throwing max velocity all
the time (even if max velocity ain’t what it used to be), and while his changeup
doesn’t have a big speed differential, he’s still had more success against
lefties the past couple of seasons.
Table 3 – Seth Lugo 2015 Splits by Times Through the Order
League
|
Bats
|
TBF
|
H
|
AB/XBH
|
BB%
|
K%
|
wRC+
|
GB%
|
SwStr%
|
Wh/Sw
|
EL
|
1
|
175
|
40
|
12.2
|
6.9
|
17.7
|
100
|
42.5
|
6.8
|
16.2
|
EL
|
2
|
159
|
34
|
10.4
|
5.7
|
21.4
|
91
|
45.5
|
9.6
|
19.9
|
EL
|
3
|
127
|
33
|
11.8
|
5.5
|
24.4
|
103
|
39.8
|
12.4
|
25
|
PCL
|
1
|
47
|
7
|
46*
|
2.1
|
34
|
-7
|
44.8
|
9
|
19
|
PCL
|
2
|
43
|
12
|
9.5
|
9.3
|
23.3
|
145
|
42.9
|
10.6
|
23.3
|
PCL
|
3
|
24
|
8
|
23**
|
0
|
16.7
|
107
|
38.9
|
7.2
|
13.6
|
*1 Homerun allowed
**1 Double allowed
When
attempting to judge whether a prospect can make it as a starting pitcher, one
important thing to track is whether a pitcher’s stuff becomes less effective as
the start go on, so Table 3 is very nice to have available to us. It can’t
replace a scouts eye telling us if his stuff looks as sharp later in the game,
but these numbers do give an accurate representation of how effective a pitcher
was each time through the batting order. His numbers with Las Vegas represent
an unreliably small sample size, but I haven’t added a season’s total row to
the stat sheets and I didn’t want to leave the info out.
Overall there are no big red flags
in Table 4 to suggest he lost effectiveness later in the start, which is great
for his chances as a starter. One trend that stands out is his improved SwStr%
and Wh/Sw the 2nd and 3rd time through the order, and I
think I know why. As I vaguely mentioned above, his curveball usage seemed to
drop for a stretch after those initial 2 starts, but then I started noticing a
pattern: Lugo was waiting to use the curveball more the 2nd and 3rd
time through the order. Of course! Because this is exactly how the Mets had
Syndergaard and Matz pitch in the minors the past two seasons, and my theory is
that Lugo showed the Mets enough in those two starts to make them change his
developmental plan. Even though he was somewhat of a piggyback starter with St.
Lucie in 2014, he made only 4 starts, and then he started 2015 as the 6th
man in a rotation with a spot reserved for Michael Fulmer, so I don’t think
even the Mets saw his breakout coming.
Lugo
recently
said that he’d welcome a move to the bullpen if that got him to the show
quicker, but with little proven starter depth at AAA, he’s arguably the Mets 6th
starter until Zach Wheeler is ready – Duane Below is the expendable 6th starter
option, aka the guy who gets called up to start and then be DFA’d. In any event, he has good control of 4 pitches that BA said could end up at least average, with a current plus curve among them, so I think it's best to let him develop further starting at AAA for now. That said,
I’m always curious how much of that max speed transfers to consistent speed
when a pitcher moves to the pen, and his curve would be a devastating combo if mixed with mid-90’s heat. Considering the range of velocities Lugo’s fastball is
known to hit, I hope to get a better read on his velocity as he plays in the
PCL this year because there are generally more radar calls from 51s announcer
Russ Langer, and the 51s scoreboard is just barely visible on the MiLB.tv feed
most nights. In each post below I kept notes of what Lugo was throwing and how
he was looking during each start, so if you want to learn even more about his
season, dig in. If you want to just enjoy the GIF’s, that’s fine to, though I suggest
you turn on hover zoom if you have it.
All 2015 Astromets Coverage of Seth Lugo, 22 of 24 starts
5/17
– 7 IP, 4 H, BB, 6 K, 91 Pitches (61 Strikes), 5 GO: 7 FO
K1: High Fastball, swinging
K1: High Fastball, swinging
K2: 89 MPH Fastball, called strike on the outside edge
K3: Breaking ball, called strike on the inside edge (looked
like a slider)
K4: High Fastball, swinging
K5: Curveball, called strike on the inside corner at the
knees
K6: High Fastball, swinging
5 HTML5 GIFs within (no direct links)
K1: Curveball in the dirt, swinging
K2: Fastball at the letters, swinging
K3: Looking
K4: Fastball at the letters, swinging
K1: Curveball in the dirt, swinging
K2: 89 MPH Fastball up and in, swinging
K3: Big curve, looking
K4: 76 MPH Curveball, swinging
K5: Low Fastball, swinging
K6: High Fastball, swinging
K1: Curveball, looking
K2: 90 MPH Fastball, looking
K3: 94 MPH Fastball, looking
K4: 77 MPH Curveball, swinging
K1: Fastball down the middle, looking
K2: Breaking ball down and in, swinging
K3: 0-2 pitch, swinging
K4: Fastball, looking
K5: 2-2 pitch, swinging
K6: Fastball, swinging
K7: 1-2 pitch, swinging
K8: Curveball that bounced, swinging
K9: Breaking ball, swinging
K10: 3-2 pitch, swinging
K11: Fastball, swinging
K12: Breaking ball on the inside corner, looking
Thanks to the Parkes radio telescope, we can now see 300 galaxies normally hidden by dust. https://t.co/rqaobBpP8s pic.twitter.com/SxCNQPf1WW— Science Channel (@ScienceChannel) March 10, 2016
Leave your comment
Post a Comment